一处原文引用20多个参考文献优化

This commit is contained in:
wyn
2026-08-04 17:11:53 +08:00
parent 485d7c8d97
commit 32fb903c5d
4 changed files with 559 additions and 106 deletions

View File

@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ class ReferenceRelevanceLlmService
private $maxReferChars;
private $maxAbstractChars;
private $maxTokens;
/** 本次校对的联合引用组总篇数(分块时仍为整组篇数,供单篇分摊评分使用) */
private $groupRefCount = 0;
public function __construct()
{
@@ -72,6 +74,7 @@ class ReferenceRelevanceLlmService
}
$refCount = $this->countCiteGroupRefs($citeGroupRefs);
$this->groupRefCount = $refCount;
// 默认每批最多 4 篇,降低单次排队/超时风险(可用 env 覆盖)
$maxRefsPerCall = max(2, intval(Env::get('promotion.relevance_llm_max_refs_per_call', 4)));
if ($refCount > $maxRefsPerCall) {
@@ -111,7 +114,8 @@ class ReferenceRelevanceLlmService
$citeGroupRefs,
array $referTypeMap,
$refCount,
array $fallback
array $fallback,
array $fixedClaims = []
) {
$payload = [
'model' => $this->model,
@@ -119,7 +123,7 @@ class ReferenceRelevanceLlmService
'max_tokens' => $this->resolveMaxTokens($refCount),
'messages' => [
['role' => 'system', 'content' => $this->buildSystemPrompt()],
['role' => 'user', 'content' => $this->buildUserPrompt($sectionText, $localContext, $referText, $abstractText, $citeGroupRefs, $refCount, $referTypeMap)],
['role' => 'user', 'content' => $this->buildUserPrompt($sectionText, $localContext, $referText, $abstractText, $citeGroupRefs, $refCount, $referTypeMap, $fixedClaims)],
],
];
@@ -258,7 +262,8 @@ class ReferenceRelevanceLlmService
- 不得因摘要提到 colorectal cancer 就给 0.92
- 仅当文献为流行病学综述/公共卫生研究,或明确讨论发病率、死亡率、疾病负担时,单条才可 **0.85~0.92**
4. **联合分写在顶层 combined_relevance_score / combined_reason**,与单条分必须可分离(例如 [1,2] 时文献1=0.45、文献2=0.92、联合=0.92**禁止在 results 各条中重复 combined_***。
**联合分不得与单条分矛盾**:若全部单条均为 0.25,联合必须为 0.25;若全部单条均 ≤0.45,联合不得 >0.45;联合分不得远高于最高单条分(禁止「单条全弱、联合高分」)。
**联合分不得与单条分矛盾**:若全部单条均为 0.25,联合必须为 0.25;若全部单条均 ≤0.45,联合不得 >0.45(此处「单条弱」指主语不一致/证据层级不足等**实质弱相关**不含规则18的分工覆盖情形)。
**但联合分不是「取单篇最高分」**:各篇分工覆盖不同 Claim 时联合按规则18的整组覆盖并集定档可高于任一单篇。
5. **「来源/化学分类」型句子**naturally occurring、pentacyclic triterpenoid、found in fruits/vegetables/medicinal plants、并列举具体植物学名
- 先判文献类型:来源综述 / 生物活性综述 最适合;**抗癌治疗综述**对「来源分布」claim 通常仅 **0.65**
- 单篇可差异化打分(如 0.92 / 0.92 / 0.65**不得**因联合而三篇都给高分
@@ -301,7 +306,14 @@ class ReferenceRelevanceLlmService
- 仅间接沾边、层级或主语明显不符 → **≤0.65**
- **联合分**:多篇经典教材已系统覆盖全部并列功能时,联合可 **0.98**,不得因个别子类/哲学文献偏窄而压低整体
14. **分值必须与你写出的 Claim 覆盖自洽(写完 reason 后必须自检;通用规则,适用所有文献类型)**
- 先按你写出的覆盖标注计算「覆盖比例」= (完整✔数 + 0.5×部分数) / Claim总数,再据此定分:
- **先判本组是单独引用还是联合引用**cite_group_refs 含多篇时按下方「联合引用分摊原则」评分;仅 1 篇时才按整段 Claim 总数算覆盖比例。
- **联合引用分摊原则(多篇联合时优先适用)**:整段 Claim 由组内各篇**分工覆盖****不要求任何单篇覆盖全部 Claim**。
- 单篇评分只看「**它覆盖的那几项 Claim 支撑得是否充分**」,**不看**「占整段 Claim 的比例」
- **主语一致 + 完整✔至少 1 项 Claim** → 单篇 **不低于 0.85**(已充分承担分工),**严禁**因未覆盖他篇负责的 Claim 而降到 0.45/0.25
- 主语一致但只有「部分」、无任何完整✔ → **0.65**
- 单篇**上限 0.85**:只承担整段一两项分工者不给 0.92/0.980.92+ 留给单篇即覆盖整段绝大多数 Claim 的情形)
- 组内多篇覆盖同一项 Claim 属**重复引用**,各篇分值照常给,但须在 combined_reason 点名
- 单独引用(组内仅 1 篇)时,按你写出的覆盖标注计算「覆盖比例」= (完整✔数 + 0.5×部分数) / Claim总数再据此定分
- 覆盖比例 ≥0.9 且无✘ → **0.92~0.98**(系统/全部覆盖=0.98
- ≥0.72 → **0.92**≥0.58 → **0.85**≥0.45 → **0.78**≥0.28 → **0.65**≥0.15 → **0.45**;几乎全✘/无覆盖 → 0.25/0.15
- **0.25/0.15 仅用于「主语不一致」或「几乎完全无覆盖(无任何✔/部分)」**。只要**主语一致**且 reason 写出**任意 ✔ 或部分**,就**禁止**给 0.25,至少 **0.45**。
@@ -327,6 +339,14 @@ class ReferenceRelevanceLlmService
- **典型示例(多事实背景句 + 单篇原始研究)**引用处「HF诊疗取得进展 + 老年HF患者QOL较低 + 低于其他慢病老人 + 因长疗程/并发症/急性加重」,文献为 Lee & Song 2015 SEM 症状管理与QOL研究
- Claim 应拆为A诊疗进展✘、B HF患者QOL相关✔或部分、C 低于其他慢病比较✘、D 具体成因列举部分或✘
- 覆盖约 35%~45% → **0.65partially_related****不得**因「都研究HF+QOL」给 0.92**不得**因有多项✘就给 0.25
18. **联合分按「整组 Claim 覆盖并集」定档(联合引用必用)**
- 把组内各篇的 ✔/部分**取并集**:某项 Claim 只要有任一篇 ✔ 即记完整,只有「部分」记 0.5,无任何篇覆盖记 ✘
- 整组覆盖率 = (并集完整数 + 0.5×并集部分数) / Claim 总数,据此定档:
全部 Claim 均被覆盖 → **0.92~0.98**≥0.72 → **0.85**≥0.58 → **0.78**≥0.28 → **0.65**;更低按实际
- **联合分与单篇分母不同**单篇按分工评规则14联合按整段覆盖评单篇偏低不构成压低联合分的理由
- **combined_reason 必须点名两件事**(这是本次校对对作者最有价值的输出):
①**无人覆盖的 Claim** → 写「X 暂无文献支撑」,提示作者该处需替换/改引
②**被多篇重复覆盖的 Claim** → 写「X 由文献 a、b、c 重复覆盖」,提示引用堆砌可精简
==================================================
【一、必须先拆解 claim】
@@ -489,7 +509,7 @@ Claim 具体内容见顶层 `claims`combined_reason **只用字母指代**
PROMPT;
}
private function buildUserPrompt($sectionText, $localContext, $referText, $abstractText, $citeGroupRefs, $refCount = 0, array $referTypeMap = [])
private function buildUserPrompt($sectionText, $localContext, $referText, $abstractText, $citeGroupRefs, $refCount = 0, array $referTypeMap = [], array $fixedClaims = [])
{
$parts = ["【正文节 t_article_main】\n" . $sectionText];
if (trim((string)$citeGroupRefs) !== '') {
@@ -499,6 +519,14 @@ PROMPT;
if ($localContext !== '') {
$parts[] = "【本引用位置附近上下文(优先据此拆解 claim\n" . $localContext;
}
if (!empty($fixedClaims)) {
$claimLines = [];
foreach ($fixedClaims as $letter => $text) {
$claimLines[] = $letter . '' . $text;
}
$parts[] = "【已确定的 Claim 列表(本引用位置已拆解完成,必须沿用相同字母与含义,不得重新编号、改写或增删)】\n"
. implode("\n", $claimLines);
}
$typeBlock = $this->formatReferTypeBlock($referTypeMap);
if ($typeBlock !== '') {
$parts[] = $typeBlock;
@@ -534,6 +562,9 @@ PROMPT;
} else {
$tail .= ' 单条引用reason ≤220 字,点名各 Claim 覆盖与分值依据;顶层 combined_* 与单条一致。';
}
if ($refCount > 1) {
$tail .= ' 联合引用分摊原则(务必遵守):整段 Claim 由各篇分工覆盖,单篇只要主语一致且完整✔至少 1 项 Claim 即不低于 0.85(上限 0.85),严禁因未覆盖他篇负责的 Claim 而降到 0.45/0.25;仅「部分」覆盖则 0.65。顶层 combined_relevance_score 按各篇覆盖并集算整组覆盖率定档(全覆盖 0.92~0.98、≥0.72 给 0.85、≥0.58 给 0.78、≥0.28 给 0.65combined_reason 必须点名「哪些 Claim 无任何文献支撑」与「哪些 Claim 被多篇重复覆盖(写明文献编号)」。';
}
$parts[] = $tail;
return implode("\n\n", $parts);
@@ -732,7 +763,8 @@ PROMPT;
$chunkRefs,
$chunkTypeMap,
count($chunk),
$fallback
$fallback,
$claims
);
if (!empty($part['request_failed']) || empty($part['results'])) {
$reason = isset($part['reason']) ? (string)$part['reason'] : 'LLM split batch failed';
@@ -771,6 +803,12 @@ PROMPT;
if (count($results) > 1) {
$bands = $this->getScoreBands();
$adjustedCombined = $this->enforceCombinedAgainstSingles($results, $combinedScore, $bands);
// 各批只看到局部,联合分与说明按全组覆盖并集重算
$coverage = $this->summarizeGroupCoverage($results);
if ($this->maxSingleRelevanceScore($results) >= 0.65 - 0.001
&& $coverage['floor'] > $adjustedCombined) {
$adjustedCombined = $coverage['floor'];
}
if ($combinedScore <= 0 || abs($adjustedCombined - $combinedScore) > 0.001) {
$combinedScore = $adjustedCombined;
$combinedReason = $this->fallbackReasonFromScore(
@@ -778,6 +816,7 @@ PROMPT;
$this->levelFromScore($combinedScore)
);
}
$combinedReason = $this->appendGroupCoverageNote($combinedReason, $coverage);
} elseif (count($results) === 1) {
$combinedScore = floatval($results[0]['relevance_score'] ?? 0);
$combinedReason = (string)($results[0]['reason'] ?? '');
@@ -939,6 +978,18 @@ PROMPT;
$refLit = $this->extractRefLiteratureFromCombined($abstractText, $refNo);
$adjusted = $this->reconcileScoreAgainstCoverage($score, $reason, $refLit);
$capped = $this->reconcileScoreCeiling($adjusted, $reason);
// 联合引用分摊保底:整段 Claim 由多篇分工覆盖时,按整段分母算出的低分与✘数封顶均不适用
$shareFloor = $this->resolveJointShareFloor($reason);
if ($shareFloor > $capped) {
\think\Log::warning(sprintf(
'ReferenceRelevanceLlm: ref#%d joint share floor %.2f->%.2f (group=%d)',
$refNo,
$capped,
$shareFloor,
$this->groupRefCount
));
$capped = $shareFloor;
}
if ($capped > $score + 0.001 || $capped < $score - 0.001) {
if ($capped > $score + 0.001) {
\think\Log::warning(sprintf(
@@ -1070,8 +1121,16 @@ PROMPT;
}
}
// 联合分按整组覆盖并集定档:各篇分工覆盖时不受单篇分母稀释拖累
$coverage = $this->summarizeGroupCoverage($outRows);
if ($this->maxSingleRelevanceScore($outRows) >= 0.65 - 0.001
&& $coverage['floor'] > $combinedScore) {
$combinedScore = $coverage['floor'];
}
list($combinedScore,) = $this->enforceCombinedConsistency($combinedScore, '', $bands);
$combinedReason = $this->reconcileReasonScore($this->cleanReason($combinedReason), $combinedScore);
$combinedReason = $this->appendGroupCoverageNote($combinedReason, $coverage);
return [
'combined_relevance_score' => $combinedScore,
@@ -1372,6 +1431,217 @@ PROMPT;
];
}
/**
* 解析 reason 中的 Claim 覆盖标注,返回 字母 => full|partial|fail。
* 同一字母多次出现时取最强标注(完整 > 部分 > 未覆盖)。
*/
private function extractCoverageMarks($reason)
{
$reason = (string)$reason;
$covText = $reason;
if (preg_match('/Claim\s*覆盖[:]\s*(.+?)(?:。|$)/us', $reason, $m)) {
$covText = $m[1];
}
$marks = [];
if (preg_match_all('/([A-Z])(?:\s*(✔|✘|×|部分))/u', $covText, $tokens, PREG_SET_ORDER)) {
foreach ($tokens as $tok) {
$letter = $tok[1];
$mark = $tok[2] === '✔' ? 'full' : ($tok[2] === '部分' ? 'partial' : 'fail');
$cur = isset($marks[$letter]) ? $marks[$letter] : '';
if ($cur === 'full' || ($cur === 'partial' && $mark === 'fail')) {
continue;
}
$marks[$letter] = $mark;
}
}
return $marks;
}
/**
* 联合引用中,整段 Claim 由各篇分工覆盖,单篇不应因未覆盖他篇负责的 Claim 而被判弱相关。
* 按「分摊份额」(本篇覆盖数 ÷ 人均应覆盖数)给一个保底分。
*
* @return float 保底分0 表示不适用(单独引用、主语不一致、无覆盖标注等)
*/
private function resolveJointShareFloor($reason)
{
$groupSize = intval($this->groupRefCount);
if ($groupSize < 2) {
return 0.0;
}
$reason = (string)$reason;
if ($reason === '' || !preg_match('/主语一致/u', $reason)) {
return 0.0;
}
// 主语/层级/类型不适配属实质弱相关,分摊原则不适用
if (preg_match('/主语不一致|主语层级|层级不对|层级不一致|类型不符合|类型不适配|不适合支撑/ui', $reason)) {
return 0.0;
}
$cov = $this->countCoverageSignals($reason);
$full = $cov['full'];
$partial = $cov['partial'];
$total = $cov['total'];
if ($total < 1 || ($full === 0 && $partial === 0)) {
return 0.0;
}
$expected = $total / $groupSize;
if ($expected <= 0) {
return 0.0;
}
$shareRatio = min(1.0, ($full + 0.5 * $partial) / $expected);
if ($shareRatio >= 0.72) {
$floor = 0.92;
} elseif ($shareRatio >= 0.58) {
$floor = 0.85;
} elseif ($shareRatio >= 0.45) {
$floor = 0.78;
} elseif ($shareRatio >= 0.28) {
$floor = 0.65;
} else {
return 0.0;
}
// 完成分摊份额不等于覆盖全段:完整覆盖至少一项封顶 0.85,仅部分覆盖封顶 0.65
$ceiling = $full >= 1 ? 0.85 : 0.65;
return $this->snapScore(min($floor, $ceiling), $this->getScoreBands());
}
/**
* 汇总整组 Claim 覆盖情况:各篇覆盖取并集,得出整组覆盖率、无人覆盖项与重复覆盖项。
*
* @return array{total:int,full:int,partial:int,ratio:float,floor:float,missing:array,duplicated:array}
*/
private function summarizeGroupCoverage(array $results)
{
$empty = [
'total' => 0,
'full' => 0,
'partial' => 0,
'ratio' => 0.0,
'floor' => 0.0,
'missing' => [],
'duplicated' => [],
];
if (count($results) < 2) {
return $empty;
}
$union = [];
$coveredBy = [];
foreach ($results as $row) {
$reason = isset($row['reason']) ? (string)$row['reason'] : '';
if ($reason === '') {
continue;
}
$refNo = intval(isset($row['reference_no']) ? $row['reference_no'] : 0);
foreach ($this->extractCoverageMarks($reason) as $letter => $mark) {
$cur = isset($union[$letter]) ? $union[$letter] : 'fail';
if ($mark === 'full' || $cur === 'full') {
$union[$letter] = 'full';
} elseif ($mark === 'partial' || $cur === 'partial') {
$union[$letter] = 'partial';
} else {
$union[$letter] = 'fail';
}
if ($mark === 'full' && $refNo > 0) {
$coveredBy[$letter][] = $refNo;
}
}
}
$total = count($union);
if ($total < 1) {
return $empty;
}
ksort($union, SORT_STRING);
$full = $partial = 0;
$missing = [];
foreach ($union as $letter => $mark) {
if ($mark === 'full') {
$full++;
} elseif ($mark === 'partial') {
$partial++;
} else {
$missing[] = $letter;
}
}
if ($full === 0 && $partial === 0) {
return $empty;
}
$ratio = ($full + 0.5 * $partial) / $total;
if ($ratio >= 0.9 && $full === $total) {
$floor = 0.92;
} elseif ($ratio >= 0.72) {
$floor = 0.85;
} elseif ($ratio >= 0.58) {
$floor = 0.78;
} elseif ($ratio >= 0.28) {
$floor = 0.65;
} else {
$floor = 0.0;
}
$duplicated = [];
foreach ($coveredBy as $letter => $refNos) {
$refNos = array_values(array_unique($refNos));
if (count($refNos) > 1) {
sort($refNos, SORT_NUMERIC);
$duplicated[$letter] = $refNos;
}
}
ksort($duplicated, SORT_STRING);
return [
'total' => $total,
'full' => $full,
'partial' => $partial,
'ratio' => $ratio,
'floor' => $floor > 0 ? $this->snapScore($floor, $this->getScoreBands()) : 0.0,
'missing' => $missing,
'duplicated' => $duplicated,
];
}
/**
* 在 combined_reason 末尾追加整组覆盖说明(缺口 Claim 与重复覆盖 Claim
* 分块校对时各批会各写一次,故先清除旧标记再按全组重写。
*/
private function appendGroupCoverageNote($combinedReason, array $summary)
{
$combinedReason = trim((string)$combinedReason);
$combinedReason = trim(preg_replace('/【整组覆盖】.*$/us', '', $combinedReason));
if (intval($summary['total']) < 1) {
return $combinedReason;
}
$segments = [sprintf('Claim 覆盖 %d/%d', $summary['full'], $summary['total'])];
if (!empty($summary['missing'])) {
$segments[] = implode('、', $summary['missing']) . ' 暂无文献支撑,建议替换相应编号文献或调整该句表述';
}
if (!empty($summary['duplicated'])) {
$dup = [];
foreach ($summary['duplicated'] as $letter => $refNos) {
$dup[] = $letter . ' 由文献 ' . implode('、', $refNos) . ' 重复覆盖';
}
$segments[] = implode('', $dup) . ',可酌情精简';
}
if (count($segments) < 2) {
return $combinedReason;
}
$note = '【整组覆盖】' . implode('', $segments) . '。';
return $combinedReason === '' ? $note : $combinedReason . ' ' . $note;
}
/**
* 从联合文献块中提取指定编号的摘要/清洗内容。
*/